Bimonthly    Since 1986
ISSN 1004-9037
Publication Details
Edited by: Editorial Board of Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing
P.O. Box 2704, Beijing 100190, P.R. China
Sponsored by: Institute of Computing Technology, CAS & China Computer Federation
Undertaken by: Institute of Computing Technology, CAS
Published by: SCIENCE PRESS, BEIJING, CHINA
Distributed by:
China: All Local Post Offices
 
   
      1 Jan 2023, Volume 38 Issue 1   
    Article

    1. ENHANCE CYBER ATTACK DETECTION ACCURACY BY HYBRID ATTENTION NEURAL NETWORK
    Manideep Beesetty, Rambabu Pemula, RVV Murali Krishna, P Praveen Kumar, Bhavani Madireddy, Susmitha Jillela
    Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 2023, 38 (1): 2432-2442 . 

    Abstract

    An attempt by cyber fraud to use one or more machines across one or many networks is known as a cyber-attack. Not every website that a person visits can be completely safe from cyberattacks. Thus, the user must assure cyber-security. By creating two distinct Deep Learning (DL) models that can recognize the existence of a cyberattack on a website, this study seeks to aid the user. For this purpose, the NSL-KDD dataset is used to build a database with more than 40 features related to the detection of a cyberattack. For optimal performance, the database has been preprocessed. Normalization, data encoding, and statistical highlighting are all parts of the preprocessing. The preprocessed dataset is then divided into its training and testing halves. Two different deep-learning algorithms generated two distinct models. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Hybrid Attention Neural Network (HANN) are the algorithms employed in this investigation. The most effective DL model for detecting a cyberattack is identified once it has been trained and tested. Both models displayed various performance categories while being trained. The accuracy values of the model created using the CNN algorithm increased virtually linearly, reaching a point with an accuracy of more than 90% after the 14th epoch. Yet, during the 6th epoch alone, the model created using the HANN algorithm achieves an accuracy higher than 90%. During the first training period, the HANN model's highest loss value is just under 90%. The final accuracy of the model created using the CNN algorithm is 90.8%, whereas the accuracy of the HANN model is 95.8%, according to testing. In the end, it may be said that the HANN algorithm is more effective at spotting cyber-attack than CNN. This concept may one day be implemented as a backend processor for a website that verifies the legitimacy of other websites and software.

    Keyword

    Cyber-Attacks, Cyber-Security, Data Encoding, Filtering, Normalization, Deep Learning Models.


    PDF Download (click here)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

ISSN 1004-9037

         

Home
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Subscription
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
P.O. Box 2704, Beijing 100190 P.R. China
E-mail: info@sjcjycl.cn
 
  Copyright ©2015 JCST, All Rights Reserved