|
|
Bimonthly Since 1986 |
ISSN 1004-9037
|
|
|
|
|
Publication Details |
Edited by: Editorial Board of Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing
P.O. Box 2704, Beijing 100190, P.R. China
Sponsored by: Institute of Computing Technology, CAS & China Computer Federation
Undertaken by: Institute of Computing Technology, CAS
Published by: SCIENCE PRESS, BEIJING, CHINA
Distributed by:
China: All Local Post Offices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
The Judicial bodies across the world started exploring the use of Artificial Intelligence. AI is used in providing investigative assistance and in automated decision making process. Today more attention is given in the task of making AI to deliver judgements, irrespective of the risks that AI enabled systems poses to the constitutionally preserved substantive and procedural dimensions of justice.AI enabled systems in adjudication raises questions on accountability, fairness, and transparency in decision making. Thus legal AI must be measured in course of deployment with reference to a framework that possibly safeguards those values enshrined in the constitution and the rule of law. This paper focuses on recent developments in disruptive legal technologies. Further explores how AI systems have attempted to represent law, judicial interpretation and reasoning. More specifically analyses the challenges and opportunities in harnessing AI into Judicial systems and their implications for human rights and Rule of Law. Though potential rules of legal AI acts as a mechanism for governing future development, however it should ensure that AI positioned in a way that strengthens rule of law, promotes adherence to constitutional values and proportionately distributes risks and benefits of AI technologies.
Keyword
Artificial intelligence, automated dispute resolution, disruptive legal technologies, human rights, rule of law
PDF Download (click here)
|
|
|
|
|